Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115
Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 is located in south Illinois. Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 has 77.07 square miles of land area and 16.88 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 population is 1,710. Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 median household income is $47,031 in 2010-2014. Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 median house value is $86,600 in 2010-2014. On average, Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 223 | 225 | 239 | 239 | 223 | 231 | 231 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 15.00 | NA | 16.00 | 16.12 | 16.00 | 17.00 | 14.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 15.00 | NA | 16.00 | 16.12 | 16.00 | 17.00 | 8.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 5.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 2.00 | 12.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 6.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 1.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 0.00 | 4.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.87 | NA | 14.94 | 14.83 | 13.94 | 13.59 | 16.50 |
Schools
Ewing-Northern Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 51 North Main St, Ewing IL 62836 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.0% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74.0% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 95% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,343,000 | $9,803 | $2,681,000 | $11,218 | $2,361,000 | $10,587 | |||
Federal: | $221,000 | $925 | 9.4% | $300,000 | $1,255 | 11.2% | $412,000 | $1,848 | 17.5% |
State: | $1,413,000 | $5,912 | 60.3% | $1,679,000 | $7,025 | 62.6% | $1,254,000 | $5,623 | 53.1% |
Local: | $709,000 | $2,967 | 30.3% | $702,000 | $2,937 | 26.2% | $695,000 | $3,117 | 29.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,461,000 | $10,297 | $2,699,000 | $11,293 | $2,331,000 | $10,453 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,228,000 | $9,322 | $2,219,000 | $9,285 | $2,216,000 | $9,937 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,338,000 | $5,598 | 60.1% | $1,298,000 | $5,431 | 58.5% | $1,290,000 | $5,785 | 58.2% |
Student and Staff Support: | $52,000 | $218 | 2.3% | $52,000 | $218 | 2.3% | $57,000 | $256 | 2.6% |
Administration: | $308,000 | $1,289 | 13.8% | $346,000 | $1,448 | 15.6% | $351,000 | $1,574 | 15.8% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $530,000 | $2,218 | 23.8% | $523,000 | $2,188 | 23.6% | $518,000 | $2,323 | 23.4% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $212,000 | $887 | $463,000 | $1,937 | $99,000 | $444 | |||
Construction: | $209,000 | $874 | $453,000 | $1,895 | $85,000 | $381 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,198,000 | $5,013 | $1,174,000 | $4,912 | $1,146,000 | $5,139 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $858,000 | $3,590 | 71.6% | $824,000 | $3,448 | 70.2% | $792,000 | $3,552 | 69.1% |
Other Salary: | $340,000 | $1,423 | 28.4% | $350,000 | $1,464 | 29.8% | $354,000 | $1,587 | 30.9% |
Total Benefit: | $548,000 | $2,293 | $571,000 | $2,389 | $493,000 | $2,211 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $397,000 | $1,661 | 72.4% | $391,000 | $1,636 | 68.5% | $367,000 | $1,646 | 74.4% |
Other Benefit: | $151,000 | $632 | 27.6% | $180,000 | $753 | 31.5% | $126,000 | $565 | 25.6% |
* Ewing Northern Community Consolidated District 115 was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.